home

How to choose a SLR camera? How to make the right choice for a beginner? How to take pictures with a SLR camera for a beginner photographer? The best SLR cameras for beginners.

It seems that there is no one left who does not know what reflex camera. “It’s such a big black unit, with a long lens!” 🙂 Well, yes, this is usually true, DSLRs are clearly larger than photo cameras. "And there's a mirror in there somewhere, or something." And this is even more true.

Let's understand why it was necessary to invent such complex mechanics. This is so that the photographer looks at the subject directly through the lens!

There was such a legendary Soviet camera "Smena-8M". What was his viewfinder? It was just a hole in the top of the case, in which there were some kind of lenses. There he is in the corner on the right, see? Looking into this hole, the novice amateur photographer built the composition of the frame, pressed the button (and his button was brutal, just like a sawmill starter), and took the picture. Then he developed the film, and saw that the picture was somewhat different from what he wanted! Especially if he was shooting something close, a flower, for example. And this happened because the photographer saw in his viewfinder not what the lens saw! After all, their optical axes did not match! The viewfinder was above the lens. As a result, the photographer composed the correct frame, and the lens shot only lower part scene being filmed. And sometimes this shift was very big.

The same thing happened with other rangefinder cameras. Instructors and teachers in photography clubs even advised students to take this effect into account and make adjustments to framing when shooting.

To prevent this from happening, the SLR camera was invented. Here in the figure below, the number 2 just indicates this very mirror. Light passing through the lens is reflected straight up into the viewfinder shaft by the mirror. Passes through the pentaprism (number 5) and enters the photographer's eye through the viewfinder (number 6). At the moment when the photographer presses the shutter button, the mirror rises horizontally, presses against the lower edge of the shaft, allowing the light from the lens to enter the matrix (or film). When the picture is taken, the mirror is lowered back. That is why, by the way, at the very moment of shooting, the image in the viewfinder disappears for a moment.

It is very easy to see this mirror, you just need to remove the lens. Usually, any modern SLR camera has a special mode when the mirror rises for a long time - then you can see the matrix, which is located behind the mirror. The matrix after all periodically needs cleaning.

Such a scheme, when the photographer looks at the scene being shot directly through the lens, eliminates the parallax that I spoke about at the beginning. There is no need to make any corrections anymore - as it was cropped before shooting, such a picture will turn out. SLR camera allows you to shoot macro without any distortion. Rangefinder cameras are not suitable for this, frankly.

Someone might say, “yes, why is this viewfinder needed, because there is a small screen.” Yes, it’s true, it’s there, and it’s often more convenient to build pictures on it than to look through a hole. But do not forget that the SLR camera was invented back in the film era, when there were no electronics. This is first. Secondly, many photographers still prefer to work with the viewfinder, considering the screen to be inconvenient. There are reasons for this - the screen does not cause inconvenience when you have a small light camera in your hands. And when you have a professional camera, and even with a heavy lens, and even possibly with a flash on top - try holding it on weight all day!

It is true, of course, that the progress of electronics leads to very rapid changes in photographic technology. And in many amateur and semi-professional models of cameras, the viewfinder is no longer needed. And if so, then they do not need a mirror! The image on the sighting screen is formed on the same matrix, which makes the final picture. These cameras are significantly lighter and smaller than real DSLRs.

I will return to the main topic of my blog - working with photobanks. Definitely a SLR camera perfect tool for any earnings, including on photo stocks. It provides so many opportunities that many photographers simply do not use them to the end. Therefore, if possible, it is highly advisable to buy a digital SLR camera for photostock work. But there is a nuance - an amendment to progress. 🙂 There are already a lot of mirrorless models on the market, or models with fixed lenses, or various other devices that can no longer be classified as mirrors, but which at the same time produce quite high-quality pictures! And which are successfully sold in photobanks.

Therefore, if someone says that a cool SLR camera is not at all necessary for a photographer to earn money, I agree! Nowadays, you can even start making money with an advanced soapbox! But sooner or later you will realize that only a mirror device can satisfy your increased requirements.

Although, this statement is true only in the middle of 2016, when this article is being written. Who knows what will happen in five years! 🙂

How to choose a SLR camera? digital reflex cameracan be quite expensive, especially if you're looking for a high-end device. The market is teeming with DSLRs of various brands, models, and they all boast a plethora of features. It is especially difficult to choose the first DSLR (digital reflex camera),which will meet all requirements. However, in the future, it will be much easier for you. PBefore making a purchase, please read our complete guide how to choose a SLR camera.

Before you finally decide on the model and brand of your future SLR camera, be sure to read the following articles:

(always DSLRs)

12 easy steps how to choose a SLR camera:

What do you need a SLR camera for?. Depending on your needs, you will different models. For home and entertainment - one camera model; for studio and wedding photography - others. Sometimes it turns out to combine quite simple model camera with a good lens, and it fully satisfies the needs of its owner.
Determine your budget. Price is often the deciding factor when choosing a SLR camera. You must remember that not only the carcass is important, but also the camera lens. So keep this in mind when planning your budget. Additional costs include: spare battery, memory cards, filters, flash, tripod, bag or case. General recommendations: when buying your first camera, consider options with a kit lens in the kit, sometimes in stores there are offers of 2 lenses + carcass. It is always more profitable than buying separately.
Year of manufacture of the camera. Digital technology is essentially outdated within a couple of months after being released to the market. The relevance of the camera model is an important parameter. The exception is the legendary options that do not fall in price even after many years. At one time, such a camera was the Nikon D300. Try to buy what came out recently. Less problems with firmware, choice of accessories and so on.
Number of megapixels. Despite the fact that professionals have repeatedly explained the insignificance of this parameter, and everything above 10 MP is excellent, nevertheless. Quantity has not the most importance, but for cropping and printing in large format, this is very convenient. However, 18 mp is enough for the eyes.
Full frame or cropped? Since the price of full-frame cameras is much higher than cropped ones, then if the budget allows you, take a full-frame one, if not, then don’t bother. Please note that lenses are also available for full frame and cropped.
Ability to shoot in RAW. Today, probably all cameras have the ability to shoot in RAW. Photo editing is a treasure!
Camera weight and size. Again, it comes down to usage. Weight and dimensions always matter, except when cameras are always on a tripod in the studio. Big sizes and the weight is especially felt when traveling and when the shooting day is long.
Zoom. If you have a compact ultrazoom, then you will have a hard time with a simple SLR camera, where the usual zoom is 3x (lens 18-55). Large zoom lenses for SLR cameras cost a lot and have a number of their own technical features.
Video recording capability. Some people need a SLR camera primarily for shooting video. Important parameter, when buying, specify the possibility of connecting a microphone and its cost. Many entry-level cameras take video, but you can't connect a microphone for better sound. Also consider the maximum number of frames per second. The HD function will also not be superfluous.
Lens (lenses) . If you have lenses from another manufacturer, this does not mean that you need to stick only to this brand. There are many adapters on the market to expand your choice. Lenses - main part cameras, and they cost a lot. However, this is the case when saving is inappropriate, as quality suffers. For starters, whale lenses are suitable, those that come with the camera, but in the future it will be right to buy a lens, just for your needs. If you have or have a DSLR, you may already have a range of compatible accessories you need.You may not have known, but Zenit and other Soviet photographic equipment are the same SLR cameras, only film ones. Lenses from them can also be used on modern technology using adapters.
Brand . Can you choose from? But there are at least a few other great manufacturers: Sony, Pentax, Panasonic, Fujifilm, Samsung, Olympus. The final quality of the photo depends only on you as the photographer.
Think ahead. Maybe sometimes it's worth spending a little more money for a model that will keep up with your needs and allow you to grow and learn, instead of buying a cheaper entry-level model that will become obsolete very soon? Sadly, entry-level models drop in price quickly and may not be useful in the long run.

Lenses (lens) - a very important part of the SLR camera.
Try before you buy! It just seems that the DSLR works wonders. Try shooting in a store and you'll see that sometimes it doesn't matter what you shoot with. In inexperienced hands, even on a DSLR it will turn out very regular photos, the same as on a conventional digital camera.
Essentially, any camera that has an interchangeable lens and allows full manual operation is a winner.
With proper and careful use, the lenses do not become obsolete. Usually older lenses from the same manufacturer can be used with more modern models. If something does not fit, you can always find an adapter.
Happy shopping and creative photos!

The design of a single-lens reflex camera

In the process of selecting the subject and focusing, the photographer observes through the eyepiece of the viewfinder ( 8 ) the real image perceived by the camera lens ( 1 ) and projected by the mirror ( 2 ) to the focusing screen ( 5 ).

The correspondence of the boundaries of the image observed through the viewfinder to that projected onto the film or matrix - the viewfinder's field of view - is important characteristic DSLR quality. At good cameras it is 90-100%. Smaller numbers force the photographer to make a mental adjustment, given that the actual shot will be slightly larger than what he sees in the viewfinder.

In a number of camera models, primarily designed for studio shooting and medium format cameras, there is no pentaprism, and the photographer observes an inverted image directly on the frosted glass (sometimes through an additional magnifying glass) through a light-protective box - shaft. Such a viewfinder scheme is called a mine and allows, in particular, to provide particularly accurate focusing.

Advantages and disadvantages

single lens reflex cameras spared from the parallax effect, allow you to visually evaluate the depth of field, bokeh, the effects of using various filters and attachments, and other image parameters. Determining the exposure according to the TTL scheme allows you to use automation to calculate and set the shutter speed, regardless of the features of the installed lens.

For these reasons, most modern professional and semi-professional cameras general purpose built according to the SLR scheme.

At the same time, the mirror lifting mechanism increases the cost of the camera, reduces its reliability, and also causes vibration and defocusing of the camera at the time of shooting due to the need to move the massive mirror extremely quickly. In some models, for the purposes of saving, eliminating oscillations or improving efficiency, a semitransparent fixed mirror was used, however, such a scheme significantly reduces the aperture ratio of the camera's optical system.

The need for space for a swivel mirror forces the use of lenses with a sufficiently large working distance, which narrows the variety of lens designs for SLR cameras.

The operation of a SLR camera is noisier (due to the flapping of the mirror, if a special damper is not installed) than that of rangefinder counterparts. This is especially important when shooting wild and shy animals and covert shooting.

A viewfinder frosted glass can provide good brightness or correct depth of field, but not both. Therefore, it is difficult to photograph with a SLR camera at dusk and in unlit rooms (especially when photographing with SLRs without a jumping aperture, such as Zenit-E) due to difficulties in focusing. In this case, the advantage is on the side of rangefinder cameras with a bright viewfinder and a contrasting spot of the rangefinder, such as Zorkiy-4 and 3, Lakes of the M series, etc.

Story

The first SLR cameras were introduced by Graflex in 1909. Almost completely similar to modern narrow-film cameras, the “SLR” was released in 1936 under the Kine-Exacta brand by the German company Ihagee.

A significant contribution to the popularization of the SLR was made by Asahi Optical in 1952. Until that time, SLR cameras built according to a single-lens scheme were not very popular. Decisive factor For a long time limiting the popularity of the single-lens reflex scheme was the mirror. It was manually raised and lowered, and the photographer would lose image in the viewfinder for extended periods of time, which made single-lens reflex cameras unpopular. In the Asahiflex I, the mirror was mechanically connected to the shutter button. When the button was pressed, the mirror was raised and held in the raised position. When the button was released, the mirror returned to its original position, reopening the viewfinder. The next innovation was the instantaneous return mirror (as in modern SLRs) implemented in Asahiflex II.

According to the two-objective mine scheme, in particular, the camera "Amateur 166" was built.

Some cameras (For example, “Photocor No. 1”) had a reflex viewfinder that was not connected in any way with the main lens. They are not usually referred to as mirrors.

One of the most popular and common activities for people around the world today is photography. And, of course, in the current age of scientific progress, the development of technology has also affected photographic equipment. Those who are engaged in photo and video filming professionally, of course, are aware of the characteristics, features and nuances various kinds applied technology. But if you are a beginner who wants to improve your professional level, or just an amateur, and photography is just a hobby for you and a way to have a good time, then you should know how a SLR camera differs from a digital one. This article is devoted to describing the differences between them.

Main difference

First of all, it is worth noting that a SLR camera can be digital or film, and a digital one can be SLR or not. The main and most important hallmark is that in a reflex camera, the picture that you observe in the viewfinder, without any changes or distortion, falls on its matrix or film. This is due to the fact that the stream of light passing through the lens of the device falls on the mirror, which, in turn, directs this stream to the viewfinder. At the moment when a picture is taken, the mirror is deflected, and the stream will no longer fall on the viewfinder, but on the matrix or film. Therefore, at the output, you get exactly the picture you expected. Also, the advantages of a SLR camera include the presence of a good LCD display. This allows you to evaluate the structure of the frame in detail.

More differences

There are several more important points in the question "what is the difference between a SLR camera and a digital camera":

Using a SLR camera, you can independently set the parameters for shooting: focus, aperture, shutter speed, and all this will be displayed on the display.
The SLR camera has a larger matrix and better color reproduction. And also it is possible to change the lens and flash, use filters, lens hoods.
The instantaneous focusing of the DSLR allows for superb quality multi-shooting.
Size difference: A good DSLR will be much larger than its digital counterpart. The same applies to prices. Digital is always cheaper.
There are other more detailed details of how a SLR camera differs from a digital one. But we now know the main differences.

Market leaders

Many companies and manufacturers offer a huge range of photo and video equipment. A suitable option for themselves will be able to choose both an amateur photographer and the most sophisticated professional. But there are undeniable leaders in the market, for example, "Canon" cameras. Mirror and digital models are of excellent quality and design. You can also note the firms "Nikon", "Olympus", "Kodak". When choosing, focus on them.

Summary

So, having understood how a SLR camera differs from a digital one, we can draw certain conclusions. If you need a compact and budget "camera" in order to take pretty good, but still ordinary pictures of the moments of your life, then digital camera. If you are serious about professional work if you need pictures top quality, then you simply cannot do without an expensive SLR camera.

Hello, dear readers of my site! Today I will tell you how SLR cameras differ from compacts. Consider their advantages and disadvantages.

First, let's look into and see the scientific definition of a DSLR. I recommend bookmarking the dictionary as it will save you a lot of time later on.

To identify the characteristic distinguishing feature between a SLR camera and a compact, popularly still often called a soap box, consider how does a mirror work.

The principle of operation of a SLR camera

After passing through the lens system in the lens, it falls on the mirror, hence the name "Reflex camera", which at the initial moment (position 1) closes the matrix with the shutter.

Further, the rays, passing through the focusing frosted glass, fall into optical system called a pentaprism, in which the image is flipped 90 degrees so that it does not get upside down at the output in the eyepiece.

The next step is to press the shutter button. As soon as we have done this, the mirror in the body of the camera rises to position 2, the shutter moves back and the image is freely projected onto the camera's matrix.

The final stage, for which the camera electronics is responsible, is the reading, processing and display of information received from the DSLR matrix. This is where the principle of operation of a SLR camera ends.

As for digital compacts, there are no mirrors there. The light is immediately projected onto the matrix and, after pressing the shutter button, the photo is displayed on the screen. The design is simple, but such cameras have specifications much worse than SLR cameras.

So what's the most importantdifference between SLR cameras?

A digital camera has on its board a reflex optical viewfinder, which is not subject to the phenomenon of parallax, since the light enters through the lens.

Note: if the manufacturer nevertheless built a viewfinder into the compact, then the light in it, as a rule, enters through an additional window that is shifted relative to the optical axis.

Consider advantages of a reflex camera:

The presence of a mirror optical viewfinder, as a result, the absence of the phenomenon of parallax, more accurate aiming at the object and its focusing.
much more than digital compacts, so the amount of noise and defects in the image is less, the colors in the photo look more natural and richer, the range of depth of field is wider, and the detail of objects is much higher.
Phase autofocus sensors, not contrast, like soap dishes. As a result, we have fast autofocus, high rate of fire.

K Other differences between a SLR camera and digital compacts include the following advantages:

Ability to connect an external flash.
for different shooting scenes.
A huge number of accessories from different manufacturers: filters, covers, remote shutter buttons, tripods, diffusers, and other "buns".

Main cons of a DSLRspeak for themselves:

Price. For the price of a budget SLR, you can buy a couple of decent digital compacts.
Weight indicators. Weight - 510 grams (according to the passport) and this is without a lens, the weight of the compacts is at least 3 times less.

What is better DSLR or soap dish?

The answer is neither. Devices are designed for different purposes. Soap dishes, due to their low weight and size, can easily fit in a pocket, while a SLR camera will have to be carried around the neck or put in a backpack. These two types of technology have different philosophies. Compacts are for point-and-shoot or I've Been Here photos, and a DSLR is a lifelong hobby.

Live chat in the comments:

I consider this a mistake: "a wider range of depth of field."

The DSLR has depth of field.

Thanks for the comment. No, I don't see it as a bug. If we are talking about the POSSIBILITY to control the depth of field, then the range on the SLR camera is wider, and if we are talking about the MAXIMUM depth of field, then the compact (if you compared the SLR with it) will have more.

With this age of IT technologies and the transition from film to digital photography, I almost forgot how to take pictures. At one time, I shot Zenit-ET, Zenit-TTL with mirrors, there was a pretty good film photo archive, and slide deposits. Then, since 2007. having switched to a compact digital camera, he slowly began to lose his skills in photographing through a mirror.

Now I'm glad that I returned to the DSLR again, now to the imported Nikon 😉

Although I have not yet parted with my Canon IXUS 1100 HS soap dish. In particular, due to good quality captured videos. On a 16 GB card, the camera shoots more than 55 minutes plus excellent color quality

Cool article. I also recently switched to a DSLR. Previously, I shot it on a soap dish and didn’t take a steam bath, and then I realized that I wanted more. Now I do not want to take a soap dish in my hands. Although there are also enough difficulties with a DSLR - it’s hard to carry, lenses need to be changed. But the quality of the photos justifies everything.

Alexey, what did you choose as the first DSLR?

I am a photo lover, but not a professional, I didn’t understand the intricacies ... thanks for the article, I expanded my horizons

Thank you, Alexey, with great pleasure!

What is the most expensive and professional "reflex camera" has a larger matrix than the "soap box" Sony RX1? And interchangeable lenses?

Sergey, offhand Nikon D810 Body

A very mediocre article.

Why are there 2 rectangles in the path of light after the lens? Maybe it's the aperture and the shutter/curtain?

They have a huge inscription "frosted glass" with a small arrow pointing at a really frosted glass - confusing.

The principle of operation of a SLR camera ends earlier - immediately after the mirror has moved away and the shutter has been released.

Again, what does “shutter fired” mean? It would be nice to explain that the shutter moves back for milliseconds, and the mirror can return to its original position much later.

The rest of the process does not differ from the process in a non-mirror device.

The advantages of a SLR camera are exaggerated in the article:

Matrix size is not an advantage of a DSLR, but an advantage of a large device. If the soap box is increased in size, then you can make the same matrix as in a DSLR.

You can reduce the matrix, but leave the mirror and the rest - the device will still remain a mirror.

The ability to connect an external flash is also available for non-mirror devices (for example, Canon G10).

It is not at all necessary that the range of depth of field is wider - it is determined by the capabilities of the lens, and not the device.

A huge number of accessories from different manufacturers: filters, covers, remote shutter buttons, tripods, diffusers, and other "buns" are also not a difference.

In total, from my point of view, there is only one fundamental difference between a DSLR - the future photograph is immediately visible in the viewfinder and you can immediately see how focusing and aperture (the same depth of field) affect it - what will be seen clearly and what is blurry. Even autofocus is not fundamental difference, because 30 years ago there was no autofocus in DSLRs.

Don't be offended by your opinion.

Oleg, hello.

Two squares + lens - tried to show the lens system. Apparently unsuccessful.

On account of the fact that the main difference is mirrors, I completely agree, that’s why the name is SLR. But at the expense of the range of depth of field, I bet ... It is very difficult to get a small depth of field on a small matrix (you can experiment on a mobile phone).

Everything else ... the size of the matrix, flashes, buns was written according to average models, meaning ordinary soap dishes by digital compacts (modern mirrorless cameras and other expensive models were not taken into account).

P.S. On account of the fact that the article should be of better quality, I agree 100%. There are plans to rewrite a couple of dozen articles on the blog, add examples, etc., but this is not my main job and I have to devote time to opportunities.

Thanks for the critique and the detailed response.

Alexey, thank you very much for calmly responding to my criticism. A lot of people in your place would simply ban me. This highly characterizes your moral qualities.

As for the depth of field, it depends entirely on the aperture. The aperture value is the ratio of the area of the image to the area of the lens not covered by the aperture. The smaller the hole in the lens, the more diaphragm. Older cameras even had a table of depth of field combined with the aperture value. In a mobile phone, therefore, it is theoretically impossible to experiment with depth of field, because there the aperture is always constant.

Thank you gentlemen, your criticism is the source of our development!

Kozma Petrov

Oleg, about the IPIG. I've read many discussions on this topic in various forums. Many write that it is connected indirectly, because. the sensitivity to light in a small matrix is less, etc.

I took math for myself. point of view, in the formula for the depth of field there is a focal length, so I think it is more correct to use the equivalent focal length, which already depends on the size of the matrix.

Oleg writes:

This highly characterizes your moral qualities.

Not a fact ... If the criticism is constructive, normal, without insults, trolling, etc., then I'm glad on the contrary, so people read the article. In general, this blog was created for the main goal - to figure out the whole theory on your own, etc. Over time, the goals have certainly been adjusted.

I doubt that the sensitivity to light of a small matrix is less, it is determined not by the size of the matrix, but by its sensitivity individual elements- pixels. The film had no pixels, but the film speed was listed on the package. I consider myself in the theory of photography to the average level, far from professional.

Here are some interesting articles on the subject

fototips (dot) ru/teoriya/grip/

www (dot) cambridgeincolour (dot) com/ru/tutorials/camera-lenses.htm

Oleg, I agree about the photosensitivity of pixels. The same point of view was expressed in an article about Megapixels.

www (dot) 64bita (dot) ru/basicshot.html

Good site. Thank you. I'll read it later. There, by the way, the photo shows a lens on which scales of apertures and their corresponding depths of field are applied.

Saw And the site is really good!

I don’t know how anyone, but for myself I came to an unexpected conclusion and result:

The DSLR only has the advantage of having a viewfinder, but it is often found in regular cameras as well. And the fact that additional accessories ... and there are mirrorless cameras with such capabilities. From my own experience, I was convinced that ... the most important thing is not accessories, but skill and a head with straight arms. Now I have generally moved to full digital equipment. The camera is a “soap box”, the video camera is hand-held as an amateur. So I will say one thing - and all this can be mounted on a tripod. Good lighting is required for taking photos and videos. In the studio, it is enough so that I no longer use the flash on the soap box. On the street in sunny weather, even more so. So the advantages of this technique are in its mobility and ease of transportation, instead of the kilogram technique. And the results already on the computer can be processed and mounted so that no one will distinguish. So here's the taste and color. The main thing is not the artist's brush and canvas, but how he knows how to draw and paint pictures. And I realized the advantages of technology at the moment of mobility, when I took and put the camera in my pocket ...

And in general ... Now I consider all this bulky equipment only visual show-offs. Like "you are a photographer or a video studio operator." More than once during filming, I paid attention to how others look - like a beginner, an amateur shows off and stands out as a professional, and how other photographers with huge lenses smile condescendingly ... But I’ve already scored on this and don’t pay attention. On the contrary, sometimes it even becomes a pity for the same operator with his bulky camera. But the IT age does not stand still. We must keep up with the times and admit that it is not the size of the device that is already playing decisive role... I understood it in time.

Thanks for the informative article. Very simply told about the complex)

Well, you wrote an article!

The quality of ANY picture depends on 3 parameters: SHARPNESS, SPEED, and APERTURE.

For precise focusing, SLR cameras appeared. This was huge progress! The photographer at the MOMENT of the PICTURE could fine-tune the sharpness.

SLR cameras make sense only for FILM cameras !!!

per century digital cameras the viewfinder is an LCD monitor: everything that happens in the photo you immediately see on it. A digital SLR is a scam for those who do not understand anything, but are ready to pay a lot to make it cool...

In digital photos, the final word belongs to the lens and electronics (primarily the bit depth of the CCD matrix).

What else to read

What does "wear a hat on a butch" mean? In domestic places not so remote, all prisoners are divided into four prison castes (they are also called ...

How and how much you can drink coffee from chicory If doctors categorically forbid you to drink coffee, then do not despair! Chicory will be an excellent substitute for your favorite ...

What foods promote serotonin synthesis? We have all heard of the miraculous hormone of happiness. It is found in chocolate and bananas, after which the mood ...

How to choose a SLR camera? How to make the right choice for a beginner? How to take pictures with a SLR camera for a beginner photographer? The best SLR cameras for beginners.

12 easy steps how to choose a SLR camera:

The design of a single-lens reflex camera

Advantages and disadvantages

Story

see also

See what "SLR camera" is in other dictionaries:

What else to read

THE LAST NOTES

How to choose a SLR camera? How to make the right choice for a beginner? How to take pictures with a SLR camera for a beginner photographer? The best SLR cameras for beginners.

12 easy steps how to choose a SLR camera:

The design of a single-lens reflex camera

Advantages and disadvantages

Story

see also

See what "SLR camera" is in other dictionaries:

What else to read

THE LAST NOTES

Categories