Mayakovsky rummaging in today's petrified. The theme of the poet and poetry in the introduction to the poem by V.V.
Almost all major writers discussed the role of the poet and the purpose of poetry in life. Russian literature has always been closely associated with social movement and discussed the most pressing problems of a particular era. The theme of the poet and poetry takes important place in the work of V. Mayakovsky. The author urged to approach the phenomena of art from the standpoint of social significance. He believed that every artist should first of all bring the truth to the people.
In the introduction to the poem "Out loud", which was never completed, V. Mayakovsky declares that he wants to tell about the time and about himself. Lyrical hero and the author literally merge into a single poetic "I" - the central image in the introduction. V. Mayakovsky was often reproached for egocentrism, for the fact that his lyrical hero perceives himself as a central point around which the world, the cosmos, and the entire universe revolve. The poet, on the contrary, perceived himself as "mobilized and called by the revolution",
The work contains a hidden polemic with S. Yesenin, who, with all the power of his poetic talent, glorified unique landscapes, and also created a large layer love lyrics, which V. Mayakovsky ironically calls "amorous and playful hunting."
Who pours poetry from a watering can,
who sprinkles
typing in your mouth -
curly Mitreyki,
wise curls -
Who the hell will take them apart!
The very rhythm of the verse in this passage speeds up to show how thematically shallow and rhythmically monotonous such poetry is. In the twenties there really were poets K.N. Mitreikin and A.A. Kudreyko, belonging to the literary group of constructivists. They are currently unknown to the reader. This fact once again emphasizes the validity of V. Mayakovsky's criticism. But it is possible that such devastating and deafening criticism contributed to oblivion.
It is important that the poet in the work of V. Mayakovsky does not seek personal gain from his difficult craft.
For V. Mayakovsky, the idea of civic and public duty is in the first place. He exclaims:
I will come to you
in the communist far
not this way
like a song-spring provityaz.
My verse will come
through the ridges of centuries
and over the heads
poets and governments.
It would be superficial to see megalomania in these lines. The goal of the poet is not to assert himself, but to convey his convictions. That is why he strives to write louder, more poster-like, more embossed. It is precisely such a large-scale, sweeping, enlarged, according to the author, that a verse should be that descendants will know and remember in centuries to come.
V. Mayakovsky angrily stigmatizes one-day poetry, rewarding it with a number of eloquent comparisons (“like a worn penny”, “like the light of dead stars”). For a poet, a poem is the most important work. Its novelty is as significant and progressive as, for example, plumbing:
my verse
labor
will break through the mass of years
and will appear
weighty,
rough,
visibly
like nowadays
plumbing entered,
worked out
still slaves of Rome.
The adverbs “weighty”, “roughly”, “visibly” seem to reinforce each other here, characterizing the style of this talented work. It is known that critics often reproached Vladimir Mayakovsky himself for excessive rudeness and self-centeredness. Indeed, in this work, the pronoun “I” placed at the beginning of the line sounds majestic and solemn. However, this poetic "I" is somewhat wider than the author's. By him it is more correct to understand not a specific person, but a creative artist in general. As for the rough language, these reproaches seem to be more just. And although swear words undoubtedly bring bright, memorable colors to the work, they also reduce the aesthetic quality of the poetic text. In connection with this, it is difficult to justify the method in an artistic sense. In modern poetry, it has become fashionable to include frank abuse in the text, but this quality just does not contribute to the increase life force works, but only narrows the circle of admirers of one or another author.
A technique designed to shock the reader is called outrageous. V. Mayakovsky loved and often used it. Perhaps, having worked on the poem a little more, the author would have abandoned frankly abusive vocabulary, but in existing version she occupies, albeit small, but key in terms of location in the work, the place of her ideas and her poetic voice: in other words, to shout enough to be finally heard and recognized.
Poems by V. Mayakovsky were created to defend one thing and subvert the other. His philosophical outlook included a number of utopian features. The poet believed in the idea of creating an ideal future and evaluated the past and present from the standpoint of this future. At the same time, V. Mayakovsky agreed with the idea that the greatness of the end justifies the means.
V. Mayakovsky compares poetry with an irreconcilable struggle, with a formidable weapon. He is helped in this by a number of expressive metaphors related to military realities (“pages of the army”, “linear front”, “cavalry of witticisms”, “rhyming pikes”). The poet believes that the topical in his historical era the works will survive the centuries and will be relevant for grateful descendants, telling them about the rebellious era of the beginning of the 20th century. After all, it is precisely for those who will live in the new, just society of the future that the fighters for the victory of socialism endure all hardships and hardships.
Mayakovsky's poem "Out loud" was written by the author in poetic form. With great regret, the poem was not published, so readers were not honored with the opportunity to get acquainted with it. The poem was written back in the 30s, which was exhibited as an exhibit at the exhibition of twenty years of Mayakovsky's work. According to Mayakovsky, the first lines of the poem are written as a reflection of the essence of the poet's work, which became the start in creative work author. The intention of writing "Out loud" was a look at himself from the future: " Dear comrades descendants! Our days studying the darkness.
From these lines it is immediately clear that the poet writes them for the future generation, and also talks about himself. But Mayakovsky also writes lines, simply indulging in poetry, but joking a little at the woman planting the garden: “I planted the garden nicely, daughter, dacha, water and smoothness, I will water it myself.”
With his poems, the poet seriously fought for the communist cause, neither fearing the government nor secret organizations. With lines from poetry, he simply pierced the soul of the Soviet people: “Unfolding my troops with a parade of pages. Poems are lead-heavy.
During the revolution, everything changed very quickly. This meant that Mayakovsky must enter this pace, join the people, and together with them reorganize the world in a new, socialist direction. With his poetry, he moved forward, while this one set this movement for the rest. Recognizing this poetry meant making your intentions real, step by step striving for a bright, beautiful future.
With these lines, the poet ended his verse "Out loud": "I will raise, like a Bolshevik party card, all one hundred volumes of my party books." His poems made me think about many things. They awakened the people to act, which, according to their plan, the poet aspired to.
Mayakovsky is convinced that the main purpose of the poet and poetry in the revolutionary era is to serve the cause of the triumph of a new, truly just social system. He is ready to do anything draft work in the name of people's happiness:
I'm a sweeper
and a water carrier
revolution
mobilized and called,
went to the front
from bar gardens
poetry -
capricious women.
The poet admits:
And me
agitprop
stuck in the teeth,
and I would
scribble on you
it is more profitable
and prettier.
But I
myself
humbled
becoming
on the throat
own song.
Mayakovsky felt himself to be an "agitator", a "roaring leader" and believed that his verse
... it will come
through the ridges of centuries and through the heads of poets and governments.
The poet was ready to sacrifice his poetry to the revolution:
Let
for geniuses
inconsolable widow
fame is woven
in a funeral march
die my verse
die like a regular
like nameless
ours died on assaults!
He, unlike his predecessors, starting with Horace, refused an individual poetic monument:
I do not care
on bronze multipath,
I do not care
on marble slime.
Consider glory -
because we are our own people,
let us
a common memorial
battle-built socialism.
Mayakovsky compared his poems to "over the teeth armed troops" and gave them, "to the very last leaf", to the proletarians of the entire planet. He claimed:
Worker
bulks of enemy class -
he is my enemy,
notorious and old.
They told us
go
under the red flag
years of work
and days of malnutrition.
Mayakovsky convinced readers: the main purpose of the poet today is to serve the cause of the socialist revolution. But his poetry must be not only revolutionary in content, but also highly perfect in form, in order to survive for centuries, to convey to posterity the greatness of the era of revolution and the building of socialism. Also in his last public speaking at an evening dedicated to the twentieth anniversary of his creative activity, Mayakovsky complained that “you have to prove every minute that the poet’s activity and the poet’s work are necessary work in our Soviet Union."
He himself did not doubt for a second that his poems were no less important for the good of the revolution and socialism than the mining of ore, the smelting of steel, the armed suppression of the counter-revolution, or the work of the party in organizing socialist construction. Because they strengthen in the souls of people the faith in the correctness of the Bolshevik revolution, in the imminent achievability of a bright communist future. Mayakovsky died with this belief.
The revolution is the collapse of the old world, which was expected in all the pre-October work of the poet, therefore the feeling of a turning point in everything, including creativity, is associated with it. Vladimir Mayakovsky urged: “Give the revolution the same names as the beloved one. watch in full
With deeds, with blood, with this line, which was never hired anywhere - I glorify the October banner raised by a red rocket, cursed and sung, pierced by bullets! V. Mayakovsky Decades separating us from the creation of the latter. watch in full
The introduction to the conceived but not implemented poem about the first five-year plan, entitled "Out loud", was the last major poetic work of Vladimir Mayakovsky. Although it, according to the author's intention, was to become part of a large poem. watch in full
Analysis "Out loud". Mayakovsky and his message
An interesting paradox is that this poem was never written by Mayakovsky. Literally before his death, he wrote only an introduction to it, which he dedicated to the first Soviet five-year plan in late 1929 - early 1930.
Getting to the topic “Analysis: Mayakovsky’s “Out loud,” it should be noted that the poet timed this verse to the anniversary exhibition - the 25th anniversary of his creative way. He himself, speaking to the assembled public, said that this work completely and entirely reflects everything that he worked on all these long years, and presented it as a report on the creative work done. So, without knowing it, he continued with this classic theme of the “monument”, begun by Derzhavin and Pushkin.
"Out loud", Mayakovsky: analysis
In this introduction, the famous poet contrasts himself pure art, which does not recognize any politics. It is in this role that a general impression is formed about his attitude to creativity in general and to its individual representatives in particular.
In some way, this poem has become a kind of message to future descendants. The poet seems to assess himself with a glance from the future, looking into the present, where he immediately strikes with the lines: “I, a sewer and a water carrier, mobilized by the revolution ...”.
With these words, he creates a certain image of poetry without meaning and purpose, which he sarcastically and sharply ridicules, calling "a capricious woman."
Poems as a tool
His poems are not just lines on paper, he uses them as a serious weapon in the struggle for the communist cause.
The poet-agitator hints that he is not afraid of the government, or "lyrical volumes", or "ridges of the ages". Mayakovsky openly declares this at the top of his voice. The analysis of the work boils down to the fact that his weapon does not injure or kill a person, but it can very much hit the soul and heart of a person. He writes prophetic lines in which he hints that his poems are lead and ready for death.
Inspiration
Mayakovsky wrote all his most desirable things in the poem “Out loud”. Its analysis suggests that everything the poet did was created not at all for aesthetic pleasure, because it builds, inspires and fights senselessness, moves forward and leads the masses. He thought that his vocation was to realize socialist dreams and go with the broad masses to a brighter future.
The writer calls: "Die my verse like an ordinary one." He believes that for public well-being, the poet must work hard, forgetting about himself and not thinking about rewards, sacrificing his creativity.
He writes in his poem that, apart from a freshly washed shirt, he does not need anything, and also that the poet and society are inseparable.
Fate and Motherland
Continuing the theme “Mayakovsky “Out loud”: analysis of the poem”, it should be noted that the active creator calls the descendants dexterous and healthy, and, in his opinion, they should remember how hard everything was paid for, he compared it with licking the “chakhotkins” spitting."
It is a little surprising, but Vladimir Vladimirovich describes the future, that the "communist far" has already come, in which he has invested maximum efforts, because every day of his work he has invested in the future.
The poet considers it his civic duty - to build a worthy future, and this desire literally weakened his soul.
This is what Mayakovsky shouts in his poem “Out loud”. An analysis of the introduction suggests that the poet inspires the people to build a bright future, and that everyone should remember those who were involved in the battle for socialism and communism, and not forget their desperate work. Their soul lives in every line of it and will surely pass through the centuries.
The great ideologist addresses them as those who truly believe in communism, and expresses himself as a descendant of these people who can no longer imagine what one could believe so sincerely and deeply, and whether there will be as much strength as there was in the forefathers of the October Revolution.
Conclusion
From the introduction to the poem "Out loud" it became clear that it is in some form a testament, written almost three months before his tragic death. This question is even more interesting, since it remains unclear whether the poet was killed or it was suicide. Many historians and forensic experts, examining all the facts, documents and evidence, came to the conclusion that he was still killed. And they killed him because he began to delve into the affairs of the government of Stalin, who deviated from the Leninist course that millions of people so dreamed of. This is a dark matter, the same as with Yesenin.
However, the most interesting thing is that his faith still began to fluctuate at the end of his life, and he had his own reasons for that. Even such a notorious communist as a result, on the evening of April 13, 1930, will break out of the soul “Oh, Lord!”. At that moment, his beloved woman, Polonskaya, will be next to him, who will be very surprised at this exclamation and ask him again about whether he is a believer. And Vladimir will answer her that he himself does not understand what he believes in.
Analysis of Mayakovsky's poem "Out loud"
The result of Mayakovsky's creative path, his poetic testament was the introduction to the poem "Out loud" (1929-1930). Here the classic theme of the “monument” is continued, which began in the poems of Derzhavin and Pushkin.
Mayakovsky chooses the form of a "conversation with posterity", accurately designating the topic: "about time and about himself." The very idea of addressing the future through the heads of contemporaries, the sharp (using "low" vocabulary) beginning of a conversation on a high topic carries a polemical charge directed against those who reproached Mayakovsky for his inability to write, considered his poems incomprehensible, who called him "fellow traveler ", not the creator new literature who predicted his work a quick death. “I am a decisive person, I myself want to talk with my descendants, and not expect my critics to tell them in the future,” Mayakovsky explained the idea of \u200b\u200bthe poem.
The desire to be correctly understood determines the tonality of the work, in which the poet's views on the revolutionary era and the meaning of his own work are presented in detail and frankly, without any omissions.
I, a sewer and a water carrier,
mobilized and called...
In these lines, the main motives and images of the poem originate. The author feels his unity with time, which determines the meaning and even the forms of his work. He polemically contrasts his oratorical, agitational poetry with the "lordly gardening" of intimate lyrics. Behind everything that the poet did, starting with simple agitation ("there was such a boiled singer and an ardent enemy of raw water") and ending with his poems and plays, stood important idea civic service of art, strengthened by the perception of the new world as its own, long-awaited, which gave a new impetus to world history.
The poet's view of time is truthful and stern, but at the same time it is colored with hope and faith in the speedy realization of the ideals of the revolution. Everything - both life and creativity - is subordinated to these tasks as much as possible, therefore, "socialism built in battles" is seen as the best monument.
Two metaphorical series develop in the work: poetry is a weapon and a poet is a water carrier. Moreover, Mayakovsky, as N. Stanchek notes, subtly plays with the meaning of the word “water”. In one case, this is a metaphor for poetry that is vital for people, and therefore durable (the verse “will appear weighty, rude, visible, like a water pipe, worked out by the slaves of Rome, has entered in our days”). In another case, this is a metaphor for empty poetry, pouring water from empty to empty (“Who pours poetry from a watering can, who sprinkles it, typing it in his mouth”, “suppressing the streams of poetry, I will step through lyrical volumes”). Even the rhythm of the work is involved in the controversy: the offensive, strong-willed pressure of the “iron verse” (“Listen, comrade descendants, the agitator, mountain leader”) is replaced by the ironically parodic tempo of the romance (“mandolin from under the walls: “Tara-tina, tara-tina, t-en -n"). The contrast is also emphasized by the choice of vocabulary and rhyme: “Rose - tuberculosis”, “rose - syphilis”, “burned out - books”. Mayakovsky appears here as a fighter, consistently defending his understanding of the main directions in the development of art in the revolutionary era.
"Out loud" V. Mayakovsky
First introduction to the poem
Analysis of Mayakovsky's poem "Out loud"
In the last months of his life, the author was busy preparing for an exhibition dedicated to the 20th anniversary of literary work. The approaching anniversary date was overshadowed by fierce criticism and undercover games of art officials. External circumstances gave rise to the poet's intention to address his descendants directly, without intermediaries who could distort the goals and ideas of his work. Mayakovsky saw as his audience the future citizens of an ideal country, characterized as "communist far away".
The poet planned to create a large work dedicated to the realities of socialist modernity. In the winter of 1929-30. he wrote the first introduction to the grandiose project. The work was not continued, and the literary text, positioned by Mayakovsky as an introductory one, was later evaluated by researchers as complete and independent.
The subject of conversation with the happy generation of "healthy and dexterous" is the creative credo and the results of poetic activity. Defining them, the lyrical hero is not shy about colloquial, often rude expressions. He recommends himself with a deliberately reduced phrase: "a sewer and a water carrier", the theme of whose poems was caused and justified by the revolutionary spirit of the era.
The images of poetry - a "capricious woman" and the lyrical "I" - a front-line soldier are means of expressing the main antithesis, covering the key ideas of the author's worldview. He contrasts aesthetic and social approaches to art, dividing them under two irreconcilable camps.
On the one hand, there is a petty-bourgeois paradise, enclosed within the framework of a lovely manor garden. It corresponds to an unworthy, insultingly petty theme, glorifying "water and smooth surface." At the other extreme, a grandiose metaphor grows up in which poetic lines are likened to weapons, and the poet is likened to a commander, a disinterested servant of the new society.
AT art space a large-scale picture of the parade is modeled, the participants of which are pages, poems, poems, a cavalry of satirical tricks. Each of the groups of personified characters is detailed: poems, like artillery, are armed with titles, and witticisms are armed with “sharpened peaks” of rhymes. Brave and experienced fighters freeze, waiting for the order to be sent to the ideological front.
The hero admits the death of a fantastic army: it is regarded as a component of victory. The poet despises external signs of respect, dismissively defining the monuments as "many-path bronzes" and "marble slime". He considers the construction of a fundamentally new society - ideal, healthy and harmonious - to be the main achievement of social lyrics.
The lyrical subject, vociferous and rude in Mayakovsky's way, is convinced that he is right and fearlessly turns to the court of the future. It is all the more interesting to trace the development of uncertain and tragic intonations in the text of the poem. An illustrative example suddenly arises within the framework of the antithesis of "pure" and social art. The hero-“agitator” sincerely admits that he is tired of the “agitprop” theme. How does a social poet emerge from a crisis? Far from the best: he preaches self-restraint, ordering to stifle "one's own song" for the benefit of future generations. The motives of fatigue and loneliness dictated the appeal to the "comrade of life", the essence of which boils down to the desire to quickly finish the "remainder days" of the next five-year plan.
In the modern reading of the revelation “mobilized by the revolution”, which is confident in the near future of a social paradise, they acquire genre features of utopia. The tragic motives are strengthened by the fact that there is no ideal audience: the figures of listeners of the new formation, as well as the confident results of the struggle against chronic vices, remain in the realm of dreams.
The theme of the poet and poetry in the introduction to the poem by V. Mayakovsky "Out loud"
“Out loud” is a poem that was not allowed to see the light of day. Shortly before his death, Mayakovsky managed to write only an introduction to a future poem about the first Soviet five-year plan. Created in December 1929 - January 1930, it was timed to coincide with the exhibition of works by Mayakovsky, dedicated to the twentieth anniversary of his career. At this exhibition, the poet said that the introduction to the poem "completely reflects what I do and what I work for." Thus, it is an account of the creative path of the poet.
In the introduction, the poet opposes the "notorious and long-standing" enemy - "pure", "apolitical" art. Thus, the position of the author in relation to creativity as a whole and its individual representatives becomes clearer.
From the first lines it becomes clear that the poem was written for the future generation. Mayakovsky tries to evaluate himself by looking at the present from the future. The “self-description” of the poet immediately catches the eye:
I'm a sweeper
and a water carrier
revolution
mobilized and called.
Here the image of “pure art” arises, poetry without purpose and meaning. Sarcastically and sharply, Mayakovsky ridicules "poetry - a capricious woman":
Planted a garden nicely
daughter,
dacha,
vod
and smooth -
I planted a garden myself
I will water myself.
The poet also throws a stone at the garden of specific "creators" who tried to write in the style of "pure" art.
Mayakovsky's verse is not just a line on paper, it is a serious means of fighting for the "communist far away." The poet is not afraid of anything: neither governments, nor "ridges of the ages", nor "lyrical volumes". The lyrical hero is a “gorlan-leader”, an “agitator”, leading an army with formidable weapons. This weapon does not hurt, wounds do not bleed, and the body does not die. The poet's weapon wounds in the soul and heart:
Poems are worth
lead-hard,
ready for death
and immortal glory.
Poetry here is not for pleasure and satisfaction of aesthetic needs. She inspires, she builds, she fights emptiness and meaninglessness. Poetry moves forward and moves others along, its calling is to make dreams and ideas come true, to take long strides into a brighter future.
War is war, it brings death and suffering with it. “Die, my verse, die like a private,” Mayakovsky calls. For public well-being, the poet must be ready to work hard, sacrificing his creativity, forgetting about himself, not thinking about remuneration. The lyrical hero in this poem does not even think about honors, fame and material wealth:
And besides
freshly washed shirt,
I'll tell you honestly
I need nothing.
The poet and society are inseparable, and the reward for suffering is also inseparable:
Let us
a common memorial
built
in battles
socialism.
“Healthy and dexterous” descendants should remember with what efforts “the poet licked consumptive spitting”, with what labor everything was paid for. It is surprising that Mayakovsky depicts future events in the past tense. He talks about the advent of the "Communist Dalek" as if it had already happened. The most important thing is that the poet is ready to fight, to make every effort, investing today into the future. His civic duty is practically fulfilled: "With the tail of years, I become like a fossil-tailed monster." The frenzied desire to build a normal future life weakened the soul of the poet. And, apart from the memory of his descendants, he does not need anything else.
In the introduction to the poem "Out loud" Mayakovsky literally screams, calls and inspires readers to build a brighter future. We, those same comrade descendants, did not live to see "socialism built in battles." But we remember your desperate work, your soul and strength lives in every line that has passed almost through a century. You sincerely believed in communism. I, as a descendant, do not even know what I would like to believe in now with the same sincerity, and whether there is as much strength in me as there was then in you ...
Mayakovsky's poems make you think about a lot, encourage you to take action. This is, according to the author's intention, the true meaning of poetry.
0 people have viewed this page. Register or login and find out how many people from your school have already copied this essay.
/ Works / Mayakovsky V.V. / At the top of my voice / The theme of the poet and poetry in the introduction to V. Mayakovsky's poem "At the top of my voice"
See also the work "Out loud":
We will write an excellent essay according to your order in just 24 hours. A unique piece in a single copy.
100% guarantee against repetition!
Listen to Mayakovsky's poem At the top of his voice
Themes of neighboring essays
Picture for the essay analysis of the poem At the top of his voice
An interesting paradox is that this poem was never written by Mayakovsky. Literally before his death, he wrote only an introduction to it, which he dedicated to the first Soviet five-year plan in late 1929 - early 1930.
Coming to the topic "Analysis: Mayakovsky's Loud Voice", it should be noted that the poet timed this verse to coincide with the anniversary exhibition - the 25th anniversary of his creative path. He himself, speaking to the assembled public, said that this work completely and completely reflects everything that he had been working on all these long years, and presented it as a report on the creative work done. So, without knowing it, he continued with this classic theme of the “monument”, begun by Derzhavin and Pushkin.
"Out loud", Mayakovsky: analysis
In this introduction, the famous poet contrasts himself with pure art, which does not recognize any politics. It is in this role that a general impression is formed about his attitude to creativity in general and to its individual representatives in particular.
In some way, it became a kind of message to future descendants. The poet seems to assess himself with a glance from the future, looking into the present, where he immediately strikes with the lines: “I, a sewer and a water carrier, mobilized by the revolution ...”.
With these words, he creates a certain image of poetry without meaning and purpose, which he sarcastically and sharply ridicules, calling "a capricious woman."
Poems as a tool
His poems are not just lines on paper, he uses them as a serious weapon in the struggle for the communist cause.
The poet-agitator hints that he is not afraid of the government, or "lyrical volumes", or "ridges of the ages". Mayakovsky openly declares this at the top of his voice. The analysis of the work boils down to the fact that his weapon does not injure or kill a person, but it can very much hit the soul and heart of a person. He writes prophetic lines in which he hints that his poems are lead and ready for death.
Inspiration
Mayakovsky wrote all his most desirable things in the poem “Out loud”. Its analysis suggests that everything the poet did was created not at all for aesthetic pleasure, because it builds, inspires and fights senselessness, moves forward and leads the masses. He thought that his vocation was to realize socialist dreams and go with the broad masses to a brighter future.
The writer calls: "Die my verse like an ordinary one." He believes that for public well-being, the poet must work hard, forgetting about himself and not thinking about rewards, sacrificing his creativity.
He writes in his poem that, apart from a freshly washed shirt, he does not need anything, and also that the poet and society are inseparable.
Fate and Motherland
Continuing the theme “Mayakovsky “Out loud”: analysis of the poem”, it should be noted that the active creator calls the descendants dexterous and healthy, and, in his opinion, they should remember how hard everything was paid for, he compared it with licking the “chakhotkins” spitting."
It is a little surprising, but Vladimir Vladimirovich describes the future, that the "communist far" has already come, in which he has invested maximum efforts, because every day of his work he has invested in the future.
The poet considers it his civic duty - to build a worthy future, and this desire literally weakened his soul.
Cry from the heart
This is what Mayakovsky shouts in his poem “Out loud”. An analysis of the introduction suggests that the poet inspires the people to build a bright future, and that everyone should remember those who were involved in the battle for socialism and communism, and not forget their desperate work. Their soul lives in every line of it and will surely pass through the centuries.
The great ideologist addresses them as those who truly believe in communism, and expresses himself as a descendant of these people who can no longer imagine what one could believe so sincerely and deeply, and whether there will be as much strength as there was in the forefathers of the October Revolution.
Conclusion
From the introduction to the poem "Out loud" it became clear that it is in some form a testament, written almost three months before his tragic death. This question is even more interesting, since it remains unclear whether the poet was killed or it was suicide. Many historians and forensic experts, examining all the facts, documents and evidence, came to the conclusion that he was still killed. And they killed him because he began to delve into the affairs of the government of Stalin, who deviated from the Leninist course that millions of people so dreamed of. This is a dark matter, the same as with Yesenin.
However, the most interesting thing is that his faith still began to fluctuate at the end of his life, and he had his own reasons for that. Even such a notorious communist as a result, on the evening of April 13, 1930, will break out of the soul “Oh, Lord!”. At that moment, his beloved woman, Polonskaya, will be next to him, who will be very surprised at this exclamation and ask him again about whether he is a believer. And Vladimir will answer her that he himself does not understand what he believes in ...