Biological knowledge in everyday human life message. Application of biological knowledge in practical situations (practice-oriented task)

With the help of this science, a person will be able to learn more about the wildlife around him. But, in addition to a purely cognitive function, this section of biology also has practical significance. Namely, the knowledge of biological laws gives an understanding that everything in nature is interconnected, and it is necessary to maintain a balance of various types of creatures. You can't just wipe out one species without harming the entire system. Such knowledge can convince a person that the ecological balance must be protected. Another branch of biology is, in fact, the study of man himself. This knowledge is also important for everyone. Biology has become the theoretical basis for medicine, giving it the opportunity to understand the specifics of the human body. But every person needs to know his own characteristics as a biological species. This will help you better understand how you need to organize your life in terms of nutrition, physical and mental stress. rational use of one's own body can significantly increase labor productivity. Biology is also useful in the field of economics, especially in agriculture. Knowledge of the laws of development of living organisms helped a person learn to breed new species that are more suitable for cultivation in an artificial environment. This greatly increased yields and meat production, which is especially necessary for mankind in a period of population growth and a decrease in natural reserves. From the above, we can conclude that the study of biology has changed many areas of human activity. But basic knowledge in this science is also necessary for non-specialists in order to successfully navigate the modern world and make the right choice, for example, in situations related to environmental pollution, or with their own health.

(taken from: "MODERN CULTURE AND GENETIC ENGINEERING" Philosophical reflections (V.S. Polikarpov, Yu.G. Volkov, V.A. Polikarpova))

Epochal advances in molecular biology, molecular genetics and other areas of biology have led to the emergence of genetic engineering, which is the basis of modern biotechnology, and began to have a huge impact on the worldview of society. The discovery of the universality of the genetic code is the greatest discovery of modern science, comparable only to the splitting of the atom. The consequences of their practical implementation for the future of human civilization are also significant. We can say that the biology of the second half of the XX century. rightfully occupies one of the leading places among the sciences that contribute to scientific and technological progress, as well as the solution of global problems of our time.

Biology in general and genetic engineering in particular are fundamentally changing our understanding of human nature, giving rise to a new range of social, cultural, ideological, ethical and other problems.

This, in turn, requires a philosophical understanding of the construction of the nature of the living, including the nature of man, using genetic engineering methods. Through the knowledge of the nature of living things, the construction of new biosystems, a radical transformation of human nature, is now taking place, which makes the latter reconsider his attitude to science itself. Now it is no longer enough to have a well-established idea that science makes a person's life better, because the knowledge of the laws of the surrounding world allows him to more fully satisfy his needs. Genetic engineering has largely contributed to the destruction of this idea - science is beginning to be seen as a source of numerous threats to human existence.

And although there are different points of view, the discoveries representing cultural innovation have become typical of those expressed by the Swiss biologist B. Mach. He indicates three motives for the activity of a scientist: 1) cognitive interest, the search for truth about the world; 2) fear of what is unknown, incomprehensible and mysterious; 3) the benefit to humanity that the possession of knowledge brings.

The latter is now, as the scientist notes, quite rightly questioned. As an example, he cites the discovery in such a seemingly "innocent" science as botany, of a substance that opposes the growth of a plant. This made it possible to change the relationship between fruit growth and leaf development. This discovery was effectively applied to cotton plantations: a new substance caused leaf fall, which greatly facilitated the collection of cotton. However, later this substance (defoliant) was used as a chemical weapon by the American army in Vietnam. As a result of the use of the defoliant, the forests lost their leaves, the ecology was disturbed, which led to catastrophic results (various kinds of diseases, increased mortality of local residents, etc.). scientific journals and newspapers lively discuss and predict the possible uncontrolled consequences of interference in human nature, as well as the results of research within the system "man - nature - society".

New drugs for humans and animals, new varieties of plants, growing children "in vitro", methods of gene therapy to correct hereditary defects in humans, various kinds of projects of experiments with the genetic material of humans, animals and plants, as a result of which it is possible to give this material the desired properties or eliminate harmful ones - all this is now the subject of numerous discussions regarding genetic engineering.

The fact is that the achievements of genetic engineering are so unusual that our consciousness, sense of self-preservation and traditional morality often protest against them.

The English biologist R. Edwards and the English gynecologist P. Steptoe put into practice the gloomy utopia of O. Huxley less than thirty years after the publication of his novel The New Beautiful World. They began to engage in the creation of a "beautiful new" man "in a test tube." As a result, in 1978, a girl named Louise was born in the Brown family.

Thus, medicine has taken a very significant step in the fight against infertility (doctors believe that about 15% of women cannot give birth to children in a natural way). However, the fight against infertility has given rise to new social, ethical and legal, not to mention medical, problems. The sharpness of the latter was enhanced by the achievements of both genetic engineering and biotechnology in general. New life manipulation technologies include: 1) artificial insemination; 2) the act of fertilization carried out in the laboratory, and the transplantation of the embryo; 3) prenatal diagnosis (and selective abortion); 4) genetic consultation and selection; 5) choice of the sex of the child; 6) genetic engineering (linkage of genes, DNA recombination). Some are happy to meet these methods, because they will defeat diseases, improve human life, solve the problem of the origin of life, outline the biological future of mankind, feed the world's population, prevent an ecological catastrophe, solve the energy problem, etc. Others meet with hostility the achievements of biotechnology because they threaten their vital values.

First of all, one should consider such an event as a biological threat of penetration into the environment of microorganisms that are dangerous for the human community and ecological systems as a whole. In the 70s. The public was alarmed by the possibility of the transformation of mutants of Escherichia coli (Escherichia coli, which is one of the main objects of genetic engineering) and other bacteria that would get out of the control of researchers and become the causative agents of new, unknown diseases. Measures have been taken to prevent the spread of laboratory mutants in the environment. Currently, biologists have come to the conclusion that working with recombinant DNA is safe enough (laboratory manipulations that can give rise to dangerous recombinants are immediately excluded), that there is no fundamental difference between a microbe with an embedded DNA fragment by genetic engineering, and a microbe that has acquired exactly such the same fragment through the natural mechanism of gene transfer, that in the fight against pests of cultivated plants (in the world one third of the crop is lost due to diseases and pests), it is necessary to use organisms that carry recombinant DNA.

Now there is concern about the possibility of the release of genetic vectors and plants - carriers of vectors - out of the control of biotechnologists. And although it is believed that this kind of danger is unlikely, it should be taken into account: after all, just an unlikely event can occur. The release of genetically engineered plants from human control can lead to at least two consequences: first, the transformation of genetically engineered crop plants into herbicide-resistant weeds; secondly, the loss of nutritional and fodder value of the plant as a result of biochemical changes.

The following concerns are related to ectogenesis (complete development of a human fetus outside a woman's body within nine months of conception). Indeed, one cannot ignore the social and ethical problems of the following two points related to ectogenesis: 1) a woman who becomes pregnant and does not want to give birth can give the embryo to the laboratory for further research; 2) in medical centers there are conditions for growing embryos in order to use them later as organ banks.

In the first case, it can really lead to catastrophic consequences. All living terrestrial organisms use the same genetic code in protein biosynthesis (which is the basis of life), therefore, it is possible to link DNA particles of very different organisms, for example, humans with plants or animals, etc. Despite the fact that these submicroscopic particles belong to different individuals of the same species or different types of organisms, there is no rejection phenomenon inherent in organ and tissue transplantation. At this elementary level of life, the most unexpected combinations are possible that can be directed against a person: the cultivation of artificial hybrids (endowed with appropriate properties and traits) for military needs, which can lead to innumerable social disasters. It is in the genes, as noted above, that you contain all the information related to the biological structure of cells and the integrity of organisms.

In the second case, it turns out that it is transplantation that puts forward the strongest, from the point of view of medicine, arguments and benefits of the study of in vitro fertilization and ectogenesis. Artificially grown embryos make it possible to obtain certain organs and tissues, when transplanted into an adult patient, the effect of rejection of foreign inclusions by the body is not observed. Some transplantologists believe that if they saw nothing wrong with the transplantation of organs and tissues taken from corpses, then there is nothing to protest against the transplantation of organs and tissues of artificially grown embryos.

Here, at the intersection of biology, medicine and ethics, the question arises: when does a person become a person? If we proceed from Christian ethics, according to which a person is a person from the moment of conception, then it is necessary to consistently and strongly condemn any experiments and manipulations with the human zygote, regardless of whether they are used for therapeutic or research purposes. For no one has the right to sacrifice one person for the sake of another, that is, evil cannot be a means to achieve good.

Some scientists believe that the human in the embryo appears only at the 7th week after conception. Thus, the director of the Bioethics Center of one of the Australian universities, P. Singer, argues that even if we consider the zygote as a potential person, destroying it is by no means the same as killing an adult - conception is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the appearance of a person. This means that not every fertilized human cell becomes at a certain moment a specific human individual. Undoubtedly, according to bioethicists, the formation of a person is a long and complex process, and up to a certain point, the embryo is only a biological creature that can be the object of various kinds of research and experiments. Only when the nervous system is formed in the embryo and the brain becomes capable of perceiving the surrounding world (which is the mother's womb for it), will it acquire the properties inherent in man.

The answer to the question, when a person becomes a person, is of particular importance today, when experiments on embryos are carried out using the methods of genetic and embryonic engineering, which in some cases amaze us. A. Pavluchuk's book "Challenge to Nature" provides a whole set of examples of this kind. In Stockholm, the Research Center at the University Hospital has a machine that can keep a seventeen- or eighteen-week-old human fetus alive for two hours so that experiments can be carried out on it. In England, still living human embryos are traded, which are used for research and then destroyed. In experimental devices called artificial wombs, a living fetus is immersed in a nutrient medium, entangled with sensors to take readings. It is excited, in some necessary places it is burned with electric current (to study tissue regeneration). The human fetus is also used in the cosmetics industry, for example, perfumes with fruit components acquire a special, refined smell. Just think: cosmetics from unborn children! This is truly monstrous and should provoke the protest of every normal person. And yet, despite the natural moral protest, the logic of the development of scientific research requires a broader view of the problem, even if we stand on the position of the sacredness and indestructibility of human life from the moment of conception.

All civilizations contain elements of cruelty and one should not build illusions that the future will be more “human” in this sense. If Europeans (we remain in the circle of our Christian culture) still approached man ethically, as it was understood in X and XI centuries. (that is, they would consider the vivisection of the dead to be unacceptable), then in the 20th century. would continue to die from inflammation of appendicitis, and huge masses of people would be crippled. Therefore, we can say: what today - in the name of the sacredness of life and the dignity of man - is considered indestructible, someday will be violated. And nothing can be done here, because the logic of the development of civilization to this day points to this. At the same time, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that all predictions of the future, based on what has been achieved at the present time, have usually turned out to be unrealistic.

A very complex set of social, ethical, psychological and legal problems, the formulation and solution of which entails a change in the norms, values ​​and stereotypes of culture, is associated with a whole range of opportunities created by molecular biology, genetic and embryonic engineering (some possibilities have already been implemented, others are on the way). stages of real projects). First of all, it is worth noting that R. Edwards and P. Steptoe, the scientific fathers of the first “test-tube” child, developed a project for an experiment on transferring a human embryo into the uterus of a pig and monitoring its development. The latter was supposed to be brief, but it would create completely new possibilities for observation and intervention in the developing embryo. However, the implementation of the project was prevented by the protest of part of the English medical community.

R. Edwards put forward another project: each human embryo “from a test tube”, destined for life (that is, transferred to the body of a woman who agreed to bear it until birth), could at the appropriate moment be divided into two halves. One half develops into a normal child (it has been proven possible), the other half is frozen and is a potential "organ bank" for the person who developed from the first half. This kind of “replacement parts” would be ideal, because the problem of engraftment of transplanted organs disappears, another version of this project is to freeze “in reserve” not half of this embryo, but its embryo-brothers or embryo-sisters (i.e., those originating from the same and the same parents)

In the United States of America, a project of frozen egg banks originated from young women at their optimal procreative capacity; these eggs are only fertilized when the woman wants to have a baby. Such a bank would free her from an unwanted pregnancy and the hassle of having children, which would allow her to pursue a career or be creative. So far, this project has not been fully implemented.

Professor B. Chiarelli, an anthropologist from the University of Florence, presented a project known as "Ape Man". The experiment is based on the fertilization of a chimpanzee with a human spermatozoon. Firstly, according to the scientist, this is a solution to the problem of "replacement parts", because the ape-man would be a perfect living bank of them. Secondly, the problems of labor in conditions that are dangerous to human life and health, but do not allow the use of automatic machines. We are actually talking about the creation of a "subhuman" (or "superanimal"), playing the role of a modern slave. Naturally, the very idea of ​​the birth of this kind of human-animal hybrids causes many fears. In any case, it is unjustified purely speculative to consider the prospect of cruel treatment of new creatures, their exploitation. Here a knot of new problems arises: new creatures - people or animals - will they have human rights or not? etc.

A paradoxical situation may arise - the woman who gave birth to the Child may turn out to be his grandmother or sister, the first such case occurred in 1978: a certain P. Anthony from South Africa took into her bosom the embryos that arose from her daughter's eggs, fertilized in vitro by the sperm of her daughter's husband. P. Anthony gave birth to two boys and a girl. P. Anthony's daughter already had a son (after him she became barren). And now he had a sister and brothers, who in a sense turned out to be his aunt and uncles. The three children born have in the person of P. Anthony a physiological mother and, together with a tembiological grandmother. Let's not talk about the mass of ethical and legal problems in this case.

It turns out that now a child can have five parents, two biological (genetic, or suppliers of the egg and sperm), a substitute mother who reported the embryo that had arisen, and finally, two so-called social parents who took the child after birth (substitute mother, in accordance with the agreement, after receiving the payment, she gave the child away, but the bislogical parents for some reason refused (him).

A situation even more surprising in character and sociocultural consequences arises when a child has two biological mothers. This means that the embryo arose from the fusion of two female gametes taken from two women. This kind of experiment has not yet been completed, the first experiments are being carried out on monkeys. Most experts believe that the development of a method that will allow a homosexual couple of women to have a child together is a matter of time. If it is possible to induce such a double gamete to develop without a spermatozoon, a child will be born that arose without the participation of a man at all. Such an experiment is extremely difficult, but not impossible. This example seems to be taken from science fiction, but it eloquently testifies to the possibilities of biological manipulation with human genetic material.

Finally, it should be noted that the method of embryo transfer is already widespread: the egg of one of the women (from a lesbian couple) is fertilized in vitro by the sperm of an anonymous man, then the embryo is transferred to the uterus of another woman (from this couple), who bears and gives birth to a child. Thus, a couple of lesbians have a common child - one of the women is his biological mother, the other is his physiological

The human species is also subject to deterministic laws of heredity, according to which offspring inherit a combination of parental traits, although the introduction of non-genetically transmitted corrections of human hereditary material is quite possible in the future theoretically and technically. However, is man an object of natural selection? Darwin expressed the essence of the latter by the formula "survival of the fittest." Is it possible to consider the law according to which traits of an adaptive character are preserved over generations (because the carriers of such traits are statistically the best reproducers) applicable to a person?

It is widely believed that the difference between the modes of existence of man and other species living in the natural environment is increasingly crowned. This is due to the fact that a person is increasingly using the possibilities of transforming his natural environment into an artificial one (objective body of mankind). Adaptation to the environment has ceased to be a determinant of the direction of evolution, because the reverse process is taking place due to human activity, the environment is subject to changes. Man builds for himself a "human kingdom" in which both the "most fit" and the "least fit" can survive. However, there is no unanimity among scientists regarding the biological consequences of this.

Some researchers adhere to a position that can be called biblical. In their opinion, modern man is a stable, unchanging creation of evolution. Thus, V. Kunitsky-Goldfinger in the book "Inheritance and the Future" argues that for a long time differentiated survival and fertility in human populations has ceased to be a factor in evolution, because "resistance to infections is in no way connected with other, especially the most biologically valuable traits, such as , as rationality, a sense of one's own solidarity, etc. There were two more factors that tormented humanity - hunger and war. After all, if anything was subjected to selection, then they were, first of all, wealth and prosperity. Nothing indicates, or even suggests, that the possible extinction of selection through infection, starvation, and warfare could in some way adversely affect the genetic value of a person. There is nothing surprising in the fact, the author believes, that the biological evolution of man has been stopped for a long time, if not forever.

Adherents of the biblical position believe that man as a biological species has ceased to be an object of the evolutionary process and that it is necessary to proceed from this position. A person is what he is, as it should be, and asking questions in connection with this is simply a meaningless exercise. It is fairly easy to show that such a position is based on the wrong premises. Let's dwell on one, but the key mistake. Hunger, war, in essence, are neutral factors of biological selection. They simply reduce the size of human populations, leaving their genetic structure basically unchanged. This is reminiscent of the action of natural disasters that cause changes in the number of other species. They are biologically neutral factors. Clearly, this does not mean that, against the background of this "blind" biological selection, the mechanisms of natural selection did not operate, biologically directed and effectively changing (at least correcting) the genetic structure of human populations. The problem of selecting the body's resistance to infections is not solved as unambiguously as V. Kunitsky-Goldfinger imagines. It can be assumed, for example, that resistance to infections results from the overall effectiveness of the body's immune system: periodic "screening out" of individuals with a weaker resistance system can lead to the selection of a medium degree of resistance of representatives of the species at a high level.

Recently, various modifications of the so-called catastrophic position, according to which the human species degenerates in one way or another, are increasingly encountered. In this case, proceed from the increase in the number of carriers of hereditary diseases (for example, hemophilia, hereditary diabetes mellitus). The increasing genetic burden of human populations (especially in highly developed countries) is explained by the fact that natural selection has ceased to act on humans, but variability is generated further, and random mutations, as a rule, become harmful. Catastrophists warn us of the dangers of the "gene bomb" by painting a picture of a "patient society" in which people will live and procreate only thanks to the system of medical care, drugs, etc.

The dangers here are by no means purely medical in nature. Back in 1953, the famous English biologist Darwinian J. Huxley wrote: “It is a fact that modern industrial civilization contributes to the degradation of genes responsible for mental abilities. It is already quite clear that, both in the communist Soviet Union and in most capitalist countries, people of high intelligence have fewer children than people of lower intelligence, and that this difference in intelligence is genetically determined. The genetic differences are small, but... „and they increase rapidly, leading to large effects. If this process continues, the consequences could be dire.” Indeed, imagine a world in which the means of subsistence have been exhausted, the number of those burdened with hereditary defects is increasing, and to this is added a gradual decrease in the level of people's intelligence! The sum of these kinds of tendencies can lead to an unmanageable situation.

In the context of our reflections, it does not really matter whether the mechanism described by J. Huxley actually operates or not. Mechanisms of this kind, which give direction to human evolutionary changes, can operate effectively, and their genesis can be diverse - from natural conditions to civilized factors. In terms of J. Huxley's reasoning, it is necessary to establish why intellectually developed people have few children: because they are less fertile (intelligence genes are correlated with low fertility) or deliberately limit childbearing due to subjective and objective reasons. The conducted studies have shown that the degradation of the intellect of the human race is not connected with the biological moment. However, the problem itself - the possibility of the appearance of hereditary traits harmful to the species of "reasonable man" under the influence of social causes - remains.

Biology as a science that studies life in all its manifestations with the help of a variety of methods, consists of many scientific areas, or sections that act as independent sciences. Modern biology is a system of sciences about wildlife. Its composition includes botany, zoology, morphology, anatomy, taxonomy, cytology, physiology, embryology, the development of which began a long time ago, and relatively young modern ones - microbiology, virology, genetics, biochemistry, biophysics, radiobiology, space biology and many other biological sciences. The names of some biological sciences are associated with the names of the organisms they study, in particular, algology studies algae, zoology - animals, botany - plants, mycology - fungi, virology - viruses, bacteriology - bacteria. The names of other sciences are associated with the structural features and vital activity of organisms: morphology studies the external structure of organisms, anatomy - the internal structure, physiology - life processes, etc. You will study the basics of some of these sciences, get acquainted with others, and about some, perhaps only hear for a lifetime.

Biological science is the foundation, the basis for the development of many areas of knowledge. Biology plays a special role in the development of medicine, agriculture and forestry, etc. It is closely related to other sciences - geography, astronomy, physics, technology, mathematics, cybernetics, chemistry, geology, etc.

Knowledge of the general biological laws, features of the development and reproduction of living organisms makes it possible to develop effective methods and means in the field of medicine aimed at protecting human health. Agricultural science uses biological knowledge to meet human needs for food, etc. material from the site

The main tasks of modern biology are the study of the relationship between man and the environment, the diversity of living organisms and their interaction with each other, the study of the possibilities of extending human life and the cure of various serious diseases, the study of biological phenomena in order to solve technical problems, the study life in Co-smos, etc.

So, biology is extremely important for solving many problems of the present. It closely interacts with medicine, agriculture, industry, and therefore it is considered the science of the 21st century.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page, material on the topics:

• the value of biological knowledge
• The value of biological knowledge for the practical activity of a person
• the importance of practical biology
• how humans apply biological knowledge
• where biological knowledge is used

"What is the meaning of biology in life?" message, summarized in this article, will reveal all the positive aspects of this area and the possibilities of its use in the future.

Posts: Meaning of Biology

Biology is a system of sciences that studies wildlife. It includes many sciences, the first of which arose botany and zoology. This happened over 2000 years ago. Over time, many directions have arisen, which you will become familiar with later.

Every living organism lives in its own specific environment. It is part of nature that animals interact with. Around a person there are a large number of living organisms: fungi, bacteria, animals and plants. And each group is studied by a separate biological science.

To isolate, biology is a science that, through its research, is designed to convince humanity of a careful attitude to nature, compliance with laws. This is the science of the future. Therefore, it is difficult to overestimate the role of biology in the future, because it studies life and all its manifestations in every detail. Modern biology unites such concepts as cell theory, evolution, genetics, energy and homeostasis.

Today, new sciences have separated from biology, which play an important role not only for humanity today, but also in the future. These are genetics, botany, zoology, microbiology, morphology, physiology and virology. They represent a whole complex of valuable, fundamental knowledge accumulated over the years by civilization.

The use of biological knowledge in everyday life

Today, humanity faces acute problems of health protection, food supply, conservation of the diversity of organisms on the planet and ecology. For example, biology in human daily life has helped save many lives through the development of antibiotics. Science also helps to provide humanity with food - scientists have created high-yielding varieties of plants, new breeds of animals. Biologists study soils and develop technologies to preserve and increase their fertility. From fungi and bacteria, people have learned to get kefir, cheeses and yogurt.

Biological science is a strong foundation in sociology, medicine and ecology. She is constantly updated with knowledge. This is its value. Thanks to biology, people have learned to cure bacteriological and viral diseases. The works of research were not in vain: the sources of such terrible diseases as typhoid, cholera, smallpox and anthrax disappeared from the planet.

The role of biology is growing continuously. Today, the human genome has been deciphered, and in the future, even greater discoveries await us. This will help such a direction as biotechnology, which aims not only to create safe drugs, but also to increase the quality of life itself.

Compliance with biological laws and the use of biotechnology will ensure safe coexistence for all the inhabitants of the planet. In the future, biology will transform into a real force contributing to the prosperity of the Earth and harmony between man and nature.

We hope that the message on the topic “The Importance of Biology” helped you prepare for the lesson, and you learned the importance of biological knowledge for the future of man. And you can add a story about the meaning of biology through the comment form below.

It is difficult to overestimate the role of biology in modern reality, because it studies in detail in all its manifestations. Currently, this science combines such important concepts as evolution, genetics, homeostasis and energy. Its functions include the study of the development of all living things, namely: the structure of organisms, their behavior, as well as the relationship between themselves and the relationship with the environment.

The importance of biology in human life becomes clear if we draw a parallel between the main problems of an individual's life, for example, health, nutrition, as well as the choice of optimal living conditions. To date, numerous sciences are known that have separated from biology, becoming no less important and independent. These include zoology, botany, microbiology, and virology. Of these, it is difficult to single out the most significant, they all represent a complex of the most valuable fundamental knowledge accumulated by civilization.

Outstanding scientists worked in this field of knowledge, such as Claudius Galen, Hippocrates, Carl Linnaeus, Charles Darwin, Alexander Oparin, Ilya Mechnikov and many others. Thanks to their discoveries, especially the study of living organisms, the science of morphology appeared, as well as physiology, which gathered knowledge about the systems of organisms of living beings. Genetics has played an invaluable role in the development of hereditary diseases.

Biology has become a solid foundation in medicine, sociology and ecology. It is important that this science, like any other, is not static, but is constantly updated with new knowledge, which is transformed in the form of new biological theories and laws.

The role of biology in modern society, and especially in medicine, is priceless. It was with its help that methods of treating bacteriological and rapidly spreading viral diseases were found. Every time we think about the question of what is the role of biology in modern society, we remember that it was thanks to the heroism of medical biologists that the centers of terrible epidemics disappeared from planet Earth: plague, cholera, anthrax, smallpox and other no less life-threatening human diseases.

We can safely say, based on the facts, that the role of biology in modern society is growing continuously. It is impossible to imagine modern life without selection, genetic research, production of new food products, as well as environmentally friendly energy sources.

The main significance of biology is that it is the foundation and theoretical basis for many promising sciences, such as genetic engineering and bionics. She owns a great discovery - decoding Such a direction as biotechnology was also created on the basis of knowledge combined in biology. Currently, it is precisely this nature of technology that makes it possible to create safe drugs for prevention and treatment that do not harm the body. As a result, it is possible to increase not only life expectancy, but also its quality.

The role of biology in modern society lies in the fact that there are areas where its knowledge is simply necessary, for example, the pharmaceutical industry, gerontology, forensics, agriculture, construction, and space exploration.

The unstable ecological situation on Earth requires a rethinking of production activities, and the importance of biology in human life is moving to a new level. Every year we are witnessing large-scale catastrophes that affect both the poorest states and highly developed ones. In many ways, they are caused by the growth of the unreasonable use of energy sources, as well as the existing economic and social contradictions in modern society.

The present clearly indicates to us that the very further existence of civilization is possible only if there is harmony in the world.

The role of biology in modern society is expressed in the fact that it has now been transformed into a real force. Thanks to her knowledge, the prosperity of our planet is possible. That is why the answer to the question of what is the role of biology in modern society can be this - this is the cherished key to harmony between nature and man.